| Subscribe: Newsletters & News Alerts | ICANN Blog | Public Comment
ccNSO's Timetable for the Possible Introduction of IDN ccTLDs
ccNSO Survey on Participation in ccNSO Meetings [PDF, 17K]
Contractual Compliance Program
Fast-track IDN ccTLD Activities
Independent Reviews of ICANN Structures
Internationalized Domain Names
President's Strategy Committee Consultations
Registrar Accreditation Agreement Amendments
Strategic and Operating Planning
Universal Acceptance of All Top-Level Domains
Past Topics
Review of the Nominating Committee
24 October 2007
ICANN has been provided with the Interisle Consulting Group's review of ICANN's Nominating Committee (NomCom). [PDF, 1,110K]. This report will be used to inform ICANN's effort to develop detailed proposals for improving the way ICANN fills leaderhsip positions. ICANN's Board will work with the ICANN community to consider this report, along with public input, in a collaborative process to strengthen this element of ICANN. This independent review of the NomCom is the second in a series of such reviews mandated in ICANN's bylaws as part of ICANN's ongoing commitment to evolve and improve its operations.
Please post comments on this report to nomcom-review@icann.org.
Comments on this report can be reviewed at http://forum.icann.org/lists/nomcom-review.
Background
The NomCom is responsible for the selection of 8 members of ICANN’s Board of Directors; 3 members of the Country Code Names Supporting Organization (ccNSO); 3 members of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO); and 5 members of the Interim At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC). Because the terms of these positions are typically longer than a year, the selection process for them is staggered. As a result, the NomCom that is formed anew each year fills just some of these 19 positions.
Each NomCom is composed of 23 persons as follows: a Chair (non-voting); the previous year’s Chair as an Advisor (non-voting); 3 liaisons (non-voting) from the Root Server System Advisory Committee (RSSAC), the Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) and the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC); 5 voting delegates selected by the ALAC; 2 voting delegates representing small business users and large business users, respectively; 1 voting delegate each from the Registry Constituency, the Registrars Constituency, the ccNSO, the ISP Constituency, the IP Constituency, the Address Supporting Organization (ASO), an entity representing academic and similar organizations; the Non-Commercial Users Constituency, the IETF and the Technical Liaison Group (TLG). In addition, the Chair may designate a (non-voting) Associate Chair to assist in carrying out the duties of the Chair, which could result in a total of 23 members.
The members of the NomCom must meet several criteria, including being:
Pursuant to Article VII (6), ICANN is to provide “administrative and technical support necessary for the Nomination Committee to carry out its responsibilities.”
The NomCom procedures are publicly available and may be found at http://nomcom.icann.org/procedures-2007.html#A5. NomCom deliberations, and the names of unsuccessful candidates, however, are not made public. The ICANN Nomination Committee Procedures 2007 provide that “NomCom members will not disclose outside of the Committee any of the discussions, deliberations, communications, records and notes, about the candidates. Further, NomCom members will not disclose outside of the Committee the identities of the candidates under consideration by NomCom, unless NomCom as a whole has decided to do so and the explicit consent of the candidate(s) in question has been obtained.”
Board Governance Committee's NomCom Review Working Group
At the recommendation of the Board Governance Committee (BGC), ICANN's Board
appointed the following individuals to a "BGC NomCom Review Working Group":
Alejandro Pisanty (Chair); Peter Dengate-Thrush, Njeri Rionge, Mouhamet
Diop, Jonathan Cohen, and Steve Goldstein. The Working Group was formed to
help ensure that the evaluator's final report (independent review) contained
the data and information needed to conduct the work of the BGC and
(primarily) to advise the BGC on whether any change is needed for the
Nominating Committee. The Working Group will consider the Independent
Reviewer's final report, Board input, and comments from stakeholders and the
public, and will:
Update
The BGC NomCom Review Working Group is considering the independent review report and public input and will develop a workplan and timeline for consideration of NomCom changes.
Next Steps
Links
Last updated: 24 October 2007
This file last modified 09-Jul-2008
© 2008 Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers